|
|
23 quality
criteria
To judge a sites
credibility there are a number of factors that contribute to its usefulness
within the teaching environment. Now that we are teaching our students to
discriminate between good sites and sites that are not to be trusted we need to
provide them with criteria to base their discrimination on. Here is a list of
some criteria that you can introduce to them to:
- The site is authorised and
has credibility. A credible site will have an organisation or
educational basis behind its content. This will often appear in the
form of a link to that organisation or a biographical page.
- Citing of information.
Where statistics are quoted all information is cited with reference to
the original location of the information and how to find it.
- Interactivity. The site
allows for a response either via forms or via E mail. The site
responds to requests and acknowledges your sending of information.
- The site has an emphasis on
information not on flashy applets that have no use or obvious
application.
- The site is updated
regularly. Check the site for the last update date.
- There are links to additional
information. One site rarely ever can do justice to a particular
topic. Good sites always refer their viewer to additional sites that
can provide specific information.
- The site can be navigated
easily. It should be obvious what to click on and how to return to
where you started. Indexes on the left hand side of the page are a
good tool.
- The site is searchable if
it is large and there is an index to the content of the site. Searches
of directories needs to be theme based and not Boolean based as you
may use for a search engine.
- The objective of the site is
obvious and stated in the introduction to the site. This should
then be revealed via the content that is presented. Often the
objective is not realised via the content.
- There is a correlation with
curriculum. The material should be related to curriculum
objectives and relate to your countries educational objectives.
- There is no
racial/religious/gender imbalance or offensive language contained
within the site. Before recommending a site you must take into account
the ethics and morals that you wish to establish within your
educational community.
- The level of language on the
site is appropriate and the font size suits the needs of the
intended readers. This also applies to the interplay between text and
graphical/video/audio files.
- Simplicity in layout is
one of the best guides for quality of content.
- The tasks set allow for the
various learning styles of individuals. Each site will have its
focus but a balance of styles is the overall aim.
- There is a variety in the
types of activities that are suggested or provided including
independent, teachers/peer dependent and co/team dependent activities
as well as a variety of kinaesthetic approaches.
- Sites encourage students to
be creative, use their imagination and make use of problem solving
strategies to develop an understanding of the material being provided.
- Project based sites provide a
project management process for both teachers and students to
follow including developmental objectives, time lines/frames and
development strategies.
- There is backup information
where ethical and moral statements are made and there is
opportunity for students to investigate alternative points of view via
referenced links or additional resources.
- The questioning strategy
includes higher order thinking skills including synthesis and
evaluation of information, application and analysis of data, presented
points of view or information.
- The opportunity should exist
to share what the student has learned with their peers via
electronic lists or news groups.
- The site provides a process
such that the information can be processed into knowledge. This
may be done through sound questioning techniques, use of visual and
audio support and investigative inquiries.
- The site clearly states what
level of ability the site is aimed at and what areas will be covered.
- If a plug in application a
link is provided to obtain it.
If responses
are accepted via the site, they are reviewed by the site co-ordinator
before being placed on the site. All lists or newsgroups are moderated.
|
|